English Translation

26 at least on the outside showed signs of normality, yet the living conditions were particularly difficult and full of rejection after the outbreak of the war. Even though the Czech population was not directly affected by war horrors, despite all the shortcomings of the allocation system, it was forced to live under the rule of the terrorist regime. He removed all the order of human rights, denied the concept of justice and justice, nationalized, plundered national wealth, enslaved the population to forced labor and persecuted and murdered patriotic-minded Czechs. No one was sure of the day or hours that the Gestapo would ring at his door. It was a tactic of breaking and bending in the concept of the Katana of the Czech nation R.Heydrich.[37) In an article published in Die Aktion, the theoretical journal of the Nazi party, Heydich explained two stages of the protectorate policy: the short destructive phase was to be followed by a constructive period. (38) The tyrannical nature of the standard creation in the Protectorate in its entirety, from seemingly neutral to openly persecutive, is exposed to the background of material sources of law, i.e. specific historical circumstances, which determined this standard creation and its institutional security, as discussed in more detail below. The creation of law served only as one of the means of implementing the conquering goals of the Nazi elite, to perfect control and extraction of all available human and material resources of the Protectorate. The question is, therefore, whether, given its absolute instrumentalization, openly declared racism, the unhidden defending of inequality of people, the consistent suppression of individual rights, as well as the abandonment of the most fundamental legal principles and the overall terrorist nature, it is still possible to talk about the law. On the basis of the link between the real interests of the Nazi power and their impact on the legal order of the occupied territory, it can be reliably concluded that the standardization governing life in the Protectorate was, in its essence, legal, i.e. to the extent that it is possible to determine whether or not it was lawful. (39)