Protektorát Čechy a Morava: právo nástroj nacistické expanze Page 246 · 246 of 289
Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia: right tool of Nazi expansion
English Translation
246 Zdeněka Kokošková, Jaroslav Pažout, Monika Sedláková : They worked for the Third Reich, (edd.), Scriptorium 2011, Note 2 and 3, page 114. 322. Vl. nař. č. 177/1939 Coll. on ordering of persons to agricultural works from 23 June; Sb.z. a n., p. 603-604. 323. VL. nab. no. 173/1940 Coll., dated 28 March, which ordered work in agriculture to be further divorced; Coll. sb. and n. p. 445-447. 324.Vl. n. 190/1939 Sb . on general work obligations from July 25, Sb. z. a n. 1939, p. 621. 325. Vl. nab. 46/1941 Coll., which takes some measures on the management of work from January 23; Coll. and z., str.111. 326. See Jiří Albert, Labour Management, Labour Law, No.3/1941, Cit. in : Jaroslav Houser, Forced Work and Occupational Law, Legal Historical Studies 13, Prague 1967, Academia, pp. 173. 327. While 107 122 children were born on the territory of the Protectorate in 1939, in 1942 it was 130 538 children and a year later already 150 414 children. Only in Prague the 4000 girls of 1924 proved in autumn 1943 before their departure to the empire more than a thousand confirmations that they were in the first months of pregnancy. See Zdeněka Kokošková, Jaroslav Pažout, Monika Sedláková : Worked for the Third Reich, (edd.), Scriptorium 2011, p. 215 - 217. 328. Ibid. 329. Vl. nař. no. 323/1939 Sb., which limits the abolition of employment conditions and the recruitment of labour from December 21st; Sb .z. a n., p. 938-940. 330. Karel Srna : Creation of employment and approval of employment office, Labour Law No. 12/1941 and article of the same author Controlled economy and contract law, Všehrd. year XXII, No.2; Jindřich Alois: New organisation of labour management, Economics and Labour No.2/1941. Cit. in: Jaroslav Houser, Forced work and occupation law, Legally Historical Studies 13, Prague 1967, Academia, p. 172.331. An example may be the caselaw of the Supreme Court of 1940 in which the additional decision of the Labour Office concerning the termination of the employment relationship is given, even though the testimony was given before the application of the relevant MSZS decree, which established the power of the labour office for decision-making. See the ruling of the High Court of 12, XI. 1940, Rv I 1210/40 Sb. n. s. 97/892, see also Labour Law, year XIV/1941, find no. 131, Cit. in : Jaroslav Houser, Forced Labour and Occupational Law, Legally Historical Study 13, Prague 1967, Academia, p. 175. 332. See Finding the Supreme Administrative Court of 10. III. 1942, No. 803/41-43, Labour Law year XV/1942, find No. 278. 175, Citation. in : Jaroslav Houser, Forced Work and Occupant Law, Legally Historical Study 13, Prague 1967, Academia, p. 175. 333. Vl. nař. č. 237/1941 Coll. on Support for Embedding to Work from May 29; Sb.z.a n., str.1245-1251. 334. Vl .nař. no.250/1943 Coll., on Support in Embecating to Work of August 27; Coll. and N., pp. 1258-1292.