English Translation

224 admission of films by the Protectorate Film Service, as a Censorial Authority. (Regulation of the Order of 26.10. 1940 on the establishment of a Film Service © VoBlRP 1940, p. 569). 51. VoBrP 1940, page 604; NZN 1940, pp. 1862. 52.See comment by Dr. J.Hoffmann, NZn 1940, pages 1861 © 1866. 53. See Pavel Maršálek : Protectorát Čechy a Morava, Publisherství Karolinum, 2002, p.62. 54. See for example vl.nař. no. 108/1940 Sb. on some measures to simplify administration in territorial or other changes in internal administration., p. 267, et seq. NZN 1940, pp. 167: Circular of the Ministry of Interior of 21.12.1939 on the occupation of positions in municipal and district councils, et cetera NZn 1941, p. 1659-1664: Circular by the Ministry for Interior of 26 October 1941 on the Land Councils. 55. See e.g. vl.nař. no. 107/1939 Coll. on some transitional administrative measures in the field of state representation of doctors, p. 485. 56.The decree of the Ministry of Education of 22.8.940 on the annulment of the regulations of language law, VoBlRP 1940, p 422; NZN 1940, page 1203. 57. For example, resorts of the interior, economy, finance, post office, supply and transport came up with a proposal for direct administration of the relevant departments in Bohemia and Moravia from Berlin. See Vojtěch Mastný: Protectorate and fate of the Czech resistance, EUROLEX BOHEMIA s.r.o., Prague 2003, p.124-125. 58. Henlein's advisor responsible for ethnic affairs Franz Künzel, regretted that the borders of Sudeten, drawn in 1938 separated mostly Czech territories from the territory with the German majority. He pointed out that the German-Czech ethnic border crosses in most sections geographically, transportly and economically uniform units. Cit in: Vojtěch Mastný: Protectorate and fate of the Czech resistance, EUROLEX BOHEMIA s.r.o., Prague 2003, p.125. 59. Hugo Jury, who was in charge of the County of the Lower Danube (Jura, a native of South Moravia who graduated from the German University of Prague and worked as a doctor in St. Pölten, was another chauvinist product of ethnically mixed border. Because Vienna was a special administrative unit, he was a Gauleiter without the capital city. So he hoped to unify the Lower Danube with a larger part of Moravia and the capital wanted to make Brno. Jury had an influential place: he headed the Parteiverbindungsstelle in Prague, which coordinated relations between the Nazi party and protector. See Vojtěch Mastný: Protectorate and fate of the Czech resistance, EUROLEX BOHEMIA s.r.o., Prague 2003, str.126. 60. K. von Neurath, ©Aufzeichnung über die Frage der zukünftigen Gestaltung des bömisch-märischen Raumes, 31 August 1940, Trial of the major War Criminals, XXXIII, s. 253- 259. Frank's ©Denkschrift, tamej, p. 260-71. Cit in : Vojtěch Mastný: Protectorate and fate of the Czech resistance, EUROLEX BOHEMIA s.r.o., Praha 2003, str.126. 61. Frank and Neurath agreed that only a minority should be affected by such liquidation. Neuratha was amazed by the unusual number of swimmers with intelligent faces and well-built bodies who would not look bad even in Central and Southern Germany.Frank