Protektorát Čechy a Morava: právo nástroj nacistické expanze Page 215 · 215 of 289
Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia: right tool of Nazi expansion
English Translation
215 11. Pavel Maršálek, Under the protection of the hook cross, the Nazi occupation regime in the Czech lands 1939-1945, Auditorium, Prague 2012, p. 44-46; Vojtěch Mastný, Protectorate and fate of the Czech resistance, EUROLEX BOHEMIA s.r.o., Prague 2003, p. 69 an. , p. 75. 12. Vojtech Šustek, Assassination of Reinhard Heydrich and second martial law in the territory of the so-called protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, (edd.) sv.1, p. LXI- LXII. In particular, Šustek points out that Heydrich's letter to Frank's secretary, R.Gies of 7.5.1942, which mentions his upcoming activity in France, was not found and No. Amort was supposed to invent this letter. The reason for this "falsification" was, according to Šustek, to show that "from the point of view of the Czechs the liquidation of Heydrich was completely unnecessary, because he was already leaving the Czech lands" and that "President Edvard Beneš and the exiled government in London were actually portrayed as uncharacteristical careerists who at all costs wanted to impress the British government, regardless of the murders that the assassination of Hellodrich would cause." Even historian Miroslav Kárný, Šustek's conclusions at this point seem too categoric even with regard to Lina Heydrich's memoirs, who remembers on the eve of the assassination "after the concert in the Valdštejn Palace, Reinhard was preparing to fly to Berlin. Hitler wanted to talk to him. As I learned later, the Fuhrer intended similar tasks as in Bohemia and Moravia to entrust Reinhard also in France and Belgium". This claim has not been questioned by the research public until now. (See Lina Heydrich, My Life with Reinard, Toužimský and Moravec, 2012, p. 143-144. orig. Leben mit einem Kriegsverbecher /Life with a war criminal/ , Germany 1974.) The addition of Paris' R.Heydrich from 7.5.1942, addressed to Bormann, in which he describes the damage action and their background in the Protectorate and from whose amendment to the upcoming action in France indirectly follows. In: Vojtěch Šustek, Assassination of Reinhard Heydrich and second martial law on the territory of the so-called Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, (edd) sv.1, doc. No.I/4, p. 20-29. Moreover, the question of whether Heydrich and not Emanuel Moravec should have been removed will probably remain an eternal and completely legitimate dilemma of the great discourse of this moving time. Otherwise, close victims of bloody repression may look at the matter, a different view was given by national representatives, who were concerned with the international defence of the existence of Czechoslovakia in the postwar arrangement in its pre-Munichian border. 13. 11 on the renewal of legal order, Collection of Laws 1945, p. 0051.