English Translation

174 forestry from October 13th (476) which allowed the district office to declare the failure to comply with the employment order as a fallen pet animal belonging to a person criminally prosecuted. The forfeiture could have been pronounced even if the accused person could not be prosecuted or convicted. According to Section 1 (2), small animals are referred to as "cattles, rabbits, geese, ducks, turkeys and guinea fowls, regardless of race, sex and age." (477) In accordance with § 19 vl.nař. no. 393/1941 Coll., it was possible to appeal to a higher official instance. The Board of Appeal was entitled to replace both the statement and the reasoning of the lower office with its statement or justification and to amend or supplement them in any way, if the conditions were met . The Government Regulation envisaged a reduction or remission of the sentence, to which the district authorities should have been empowered (§ 20). A relatively frequent administrative punishment was the imposition of order fines up to the amount of 2000 K according to vl. nav. no. 128/1942 Coll. on the procedure for imposing order penalty before the authorities of work from 2nd April (478). on proceedings in matters falling within the competence of the political authorities (government) of 13 January (479), to which the above regulation on order fines referred in its sections. on a criminal order in administrative criminal proceedings of 24 April (480) which allowed the administrative authorities without further proceedings to impose a fine on persons over the age of 18 in the form of a criminal warrant of up to 1000 K and prison within 3 days, or both, if the offence was committed by a court, another administrative authority or public authority, or the conclusion of the commission of the offence has been established by the administrative authority on the basis of its own official observation, permanent record or confession before them, or if the notification made by any other authority or authorities other than the competent authority has shown that the offence is committed by public or private instruments (§ 1). According to Section 3, the accused may have filed a complaint against the criminal order within 8 days of the date of delivery in writing or orally and at the same time provide evidence serving his defence.