English Translation

121 2.3.2.3 The general work obligation and the order to work The general employment obligation preceded the ordering of persons to agricultural work on the basis of Government Regulation No. 177/1939 Coll. of 23 June (322), which was the first swallow to introduce forced labour in the Protectorate and to abandon the so-called voluntary recruitment of labour. of March 28, which further divorced the order for work in agriculture. (232) In order to ensure the timely execution of the necessary agricultural work, the Labour Office could order persons capable of carrying out agricultural work in the old age from the finished 16th to the finished 60th year. The period of the commandment was no more than three months in the calendar year if it was unemployed and persons who had no profession, not more than 6 months in a calendar year and when it was a commandment to work, usually provided by the family or deputies, up to one year. 190/1939 Coll., of July 25, introduced a general work obligation for all male work capable of protecting nationals in the age of 16 through the completed 25th year, for the execution of particularly important tasks. The work obligation lasted a year and could be extended for two years. Acts or omissions against the regulations of this Regulation or against implementing regulations were punished by the district authorities by a fine up to 20,000.- K or by prison until 6 Sunday. (324) According to Government Regulation No.195/1939 Coll. On 24 August, by which the General Labour Regulations were implemented, the person who was placed under a call notice had to be entitled to do so, which was decided by the doctor. For important reasons, he could have requested a stay, and the competent labour office decided on this request. The entry into employment could have been postponed at the latest until the end of the calendar year in which the person subject to employment obligations completed the 28th year of his age. Otherwise, pursuant to § 15 it was true that neither proper nor exceptional remedies could be brought against decisions to be taken in the implementation of the government regulation, unless they were claims from employment (e.g. in other words, as soon as the person has received the call notice,