STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1735, sig. 109-4/1490 Page 105 · 105 of 114
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1735, sig. 109-4/1490
English Translation
4Has no money played a role, he wants to have used only in the sense that it must have no fears, it could somehow be shortened by the Reichsstelle in its legal claims. He, Verner, has already solved much larger matters and cases to the mutual satisfaction. When Dr. Verner finally decided that Mrs. Maceška was entitled to 6.800 crowns per month from the police of the order and that the police received the right of use for the summer and winter rides, as well as for the horses of Ms. Maceska, then in this decision, however, there was initially a contradiction with the request for the order poli- zei, which only requested a part of the riding school in the tree garden. However, according to Verner, the position was based on the fact that Ms Maceška claimed that the seizure in the summer would cause her a monthly damage of K 40,000,--, so that the police would have to pay K 200,000,- for five summer months alone, without prejudice to the fact, that Mrs Macežka would still have caused a substantial damage to her business for the winter months. Verner has therefore proposed that the whole company be liguided and, under this condition, a replacement of K 140,000,-- be made for the whole year. He therefore believed that the police would create much more favourable financial conditions and significantly increased use possibilities. Ms Maceška, however, disagreed with this decision and personally informed Dr Verner that she would appeal. Verner replied that he had expected it to be satisfied with this decision, since the fixed compensation of K 6,800.- after the accounting check represents a substitute for the loss of income and also allows it to live off this clearance. If it nevertheless wants to continue the company, it does so at its own risk. The appeal sent Dr. Verner to Dr. Zuleger and referred Ms. Maceška to this. Dr.Verner concluded: "I knew that my decision was subject to criticism by the highest administrative bodies/Reichs and Protectorate offices/ and I am in 19170