English Translation

3. Examination result: The verification and comparison of the invoice submitted with the documents and assistance cited above has led to the following findings: The invoice submitted is in accordance with the supporting documents and relevant documents, with the exception of a payment to the forwarding company Ki r h e n b e r g e r , Prague, for removal costs (A l7/l2), which have been shown and paid in the invoice with K 2.956.--. However, the legal amount is K 1,956.--. The total amount of the conversion and refurbishing costs is thus reduced from .............K 48o.163.5o of the invoice difference of......K_l.ooo.- on....... ..........K 479.163.50 if the fee paid to the architect Böhm under examination (point 6) is fine.....K 35.ooo.- If this orally agreed fee requirement of K 35.ooo.--, which does not appear to be covered by invoice, but, as the burden tasks of the Böhmisches Escompte-Bank and Cre- ditanstalt prove to have been transferred, is not in order, then the conversion and installation costs would still be reduced by this amount, i.e. to...........K 444.163.5o.