STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1785, sig. 109-5/13 Page 90 · 90 of 94
THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1785, sig. 109-5/13
English Translation
87 b) After the second meeting at my office, the SD-Leibtabsonitt Prague, I -Oberstuf. Führer wrote to me that he would like to speak with me with reference to your discussion. I decreed on the letter on l4.1.194l that the personal files should be presented to me. The proposal was made at l5.1.l94l, without the process that I thought I had to remember. I then had to look into this process. In the meantime I left on 25.1.194l for a longer business trip and only returned to Prague on 20.3.194l. The file was then presented to me again without this process, so that I had to do further research first. c) Until the receipt of your letter on 24.5.194l, I no longer dealt with the process for me, since it was no longer submitted to me in the course of my business. 3.) On the basis of your letter dated May 2, 1994, I had the investigation carried out at the Criminal Police Department in Prague, in which case the Dr. B a y e r was questioned. The result is: "An investigation into forgery and fraud is being conducted against a director of the "Teta" department store at the criminal police department in Prague. In the course of these investigations, Dr. 32 Dr. B a y e r is accused and is competent to have received unrequited contributions from the co-owner of the company "Teta", the -Oberstuf. Max F h e r. The suspicion of bribery is given. To clarify the facts Dr. A y er was asked about the debts and gave him the opportunity to justify. It was also necessary that the interrogating official also had to ask the accused about the alleged visits to the bar. In this point, Dr. Vayer voluntarily and in his own decision, among other things, declared the following "at the beginning of the acquaintance with F er er am I