STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1785, sig. 109-5/13 Page 3 · 3 of 94
THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1785, sig. 109-5/13
English Translation
2 - 2 - or a member of a structure of the NSDAP. He had been able to obtain a reference certificate for brown shirts at the ij-site commandantship Prague. Knof was arrested for violating § 4 and 5 of the Insidious Law. He sent a copy of the arrest warrant to the main office, which received a request for the transfer of the files of the local court, and Knof and Wartschek, incidentally, made themselves punishable for the purchase of goods subject to registration at overprices without a reference note. To this extent, there is a criminal police investigation against them. Both advertisers were not in possession of the prescribed approval of the Department of Cultural Policy Affairs for such promotions in the Protectorate. Knof is in custody, while Wartschek was expelled from the Protectorates. 2.) The representative Anton P 1 osc h e (born on 1.12.195 in Teplitz-Schönau, residing in Pihanken) and the general secretary Josef K a m i t z (born 11.12.195). since the end of May for the shipping bookshop Köhler & Krüger (Berlin SW 68, Friedrichstr.25) carried out an advertisement for the brochure mentioned above in the Protectorate. Both were not in possession of an approval of a party office or the Reichsprotektor. The Kamitz had already been banned from advertising in the Protectorate at the beginning of the year 4l. He had been made aware of the fact that under all circumstances he must have an approval of the Reichsprotector. Since Kamitz, who was already sentenced to six months in prison for embezzlement, tried to escape his arrest by the secret state police and refused to come to the department, he was taken to prison. Plosche, who has left the party for embezzlement, was temporarily arrested because of the danger of blackout and then obtained a ban on residence for the protectorate. According to the results of the investigation, it is clear that the paragraph of the brochure by the above-mentioned representatives is in completely responsible -3 -