STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1592, sig. 109-4/1346 (poškozeno) Page 112 · 112 of 250
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1592, sig. 109-4/1346 (damaged)
English Translation
.9 s -. 1.5 - A even arbitrariness of assessment. The assessments made by the tax authorities in the cases of confiscation show throughout that the amounts of tax paid, especially in the case of emigrated Jews, were considerably lower in the previous years than i: in the period after the establishment of the Protectorate, although the Jews have often spent considerable parts of their assets abroad before or after the construction of the protectorate. However, a follow-up of the tax determination would not have been possible at all due to a lack of tax experts and staff, and it is also likely that it will not be possible to carry out any checks later on from technical and familial grinning. It should not be overlooked that the discharge of current taxes, including the tax on emigration, of 25 %. The principal non-subjugation of the Reich's assets under the technical tax treasury was therefore of crucial importance for the further execution of the confiscation proceedings. In various calculations and negotiations with the Pinanz group of the official offices of the Reichsprotektor, it was possible to apply the central point of the state police. In particular, it has been recognized that the state-police confiscations carried out with the aim of confiscating for the benefit of the German Reiohe completely excludes the federal property owners. The German Reich takes its place in a tax-related relationship. Therefore, the future Reich's collection assets must in principle be equated with the assets of the Reich already collected. The Reich is neither directly nor indirectly liable for personal tax claims against the previous property owner. Personal taxes are to be regarded as all taxes, income taxes, pension taxes, payroll taxes and the tax on emigration.