STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 500, sig. 109-4/246 Page 42 · 42 of 45
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE REAL PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 500, sig. 109-4/246
English Translation
- 2 - The circular letter of the 'Mährische Faschisten' under M ančal and K o b si n ek (Appendix 2) was produced without any influence from here, but at the moment it is considered very desirable, because it crosses the recent efforts of G a j d a s to become politically active again. In the "ČNsT-Vlaika" the further development proceeds quite logically and quite desired. On 8.10.42, Rys had to unform the leadership of the "Czech Labour Front" (ČPF) because the former head of the ČPF, S v o- b'o d a, came to Rys in opposition for monetary claims and resigned from his post of administrator. Svoboda now intends to diverge to another legal group. In ČPF membership circles, this process has left a great deal of room for manoeuvre because it is assumed that an incorrect attitude to money issues could be the cause of this. The arrest of Vlajka officials as well as the mediation of functionaries to the work assignment IrsReich has talked a lot about in Vlayka circles sEVe and heavily burdened Rys and the leadership in a responsible way. Rys is therefore in order to maintain his reputation and to prevail. Also on 12.10.42 the Gaugegegebiet- und Kreisgebieterleitung Prague must be remodelled and has also been introduced by the Gaubebietleitungen Kladno before the decision to create either in the Vlajka order to accept B0e or a stoppage of the most important functionaries in Kladna. After the Vlajka was active in the Kladno Gau area recently, Rys is likely to be particularly affected by this. From the dispatch of his most important employees to work in the Reich Rys is little pleased and L5S said these days that he had been informed by the former organizational director P o 1 i v k a /and another Vlajka member by written notice, they were already two days in Halle or Nuremberg and had no work yet. Both were expressed; it appears that: