English Translation

4.r.ipm. - 3 - Additional message L o n d o n - (Czech), From the homeland we got the news that in various cities of csR sympathy rallies in favour of Yugoslavia were organized, during which everywhere the call became loud: "At'žije Yugoslavia" ( "Long live Yugoslavia "). Afterwards, we all found that in the cities, the streets and houses were marked with a "y". This "y» is a symbol in two ways: "y" means for us " vitezstvi ("victoire"), for the French it means "victory" ("victory", for the British) and for the Hollender it means 'vrijheut" (pretence) and on the other hand it is symbolic for the Germans: there is "y-"forbidden". Talks with the homeland. As we learn, the Prague police inspector Miroslav Prajmit died in the concentration camp. He has been beaten to death here. He was very popular in Prague and the news of his death will certainly cause great regret. Inapector Praj- me has always fulfilled his duty for his people and fatherland. He saw at the time of the republic the growing danger and fought where he could against the German attacks. That could never be forgotten to him. We write his name today on the list of those who demand revenge. You hear today again the member of the Czechoslovak State Council Dr. Stransky: A lecture on Russia would have to be initiated with Marx and his "capital", but that would go beyond the time of a quarter of an hour. I can actually assume that it is possible, since most of you yourself have read about it and if not, then I definitely heard it. Let us remember, and today, only that Marx has called for a new social revolution. Marx was convinced that the capital of a country was piled up until one day the proletarita was empowered to eat. And only then, until the capital is in the hands of the proletariat, can one think of a new development. In reality, however, it has become quite different. The proletariat should have been reorganized by all. The workers' visa was always politically radical, and that was also the condition which Marx used for a resolution. Democracies were never a ground for a revolution in the sense of Marx. In the country where capital is greatest, the least revolution was always, Anders atand it was with the revolution in Russia. Russia was not a capitalist, nor was it a feudal state. Russia had always struggled with political and industrial difficulties. Russia was still trying to adopt democratic principles in the first days of our century. It established a parliament which had no real representatives of the people as members. They wanted to grant the Russian peasants greater rights. Even if they were given a small country, it did not change much in its situation. It remained the same as it was before.