STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2052, sig. 109-7/59 Page 40 · 40 of 88
A SOCIETY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2052, sig. 109-7/59
English Translation
34a the German services already have to pay compensation for the temporary release of institutions of the protectorate authorities. All the more, compensation must be paid in cases in which the Reich claims a change of ownership from the Protectorate (so the Financial Group). The above-mentioned order of the Reichsprotektor is quite right outside the territory of the state defense. As far as it is used for land which is needed by the Reich for defence purposes, it is in my opinion a contradiction of the administration of the Empire, to which there is no jurisprudence. 3. In the rest of the Reich, there was also no exchange of information between public authorities (Reichngemeinden, etc.) and non-remunerated countries (Finance Group, Group IW in a letter dated 12 April 1941). It is true that according to the law on land procurement for the purposes of the Wehrmacht of 29 March 1935 (RGBl.I p.467) compensation is provided for even if a country is called upon by a public body. Similarly, subject to the general budgetary provisions (Section 65 of the Financial Regulation), items under the administration of the Reich may only be surrendered against reimbursement of the value, unless the Minister of the Empire of the Pinanzen grants an exemption. However, there is no reason to use these provisions to interpret the special provisions of the Protectorate in a completely different manner. III. In essence, the whole of the crime is a political question. If one wants to use the protectorate for defence performance via the matricular contribution, then the above-mentioned Archl 27408 path takes place.