A SOCIETY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2052, sig. 109-7/59

Page 37

English Translation

838 THE GUIDE OF THE JUSTIZ GROUP Prague, July 1941. MinCouncil C r e s e r 36 I 9 Gen. II 9o26a Betr.: Expropriation of the Kuhberg area in Brno. 5 Appendices. As to the question whether the Kuhberg area in Brno can be expropriated without compensation in favour of the Waffen-SS according to § 6 of the Law of 29 March 1935 on the Expropriation for the purposes of the defense of the state (Slg. no. The starting point for any legal discussion is the decree of the Imperial Protector on the law of the former Czecho-Slovak Republic for the defence of the state of April 11, 1940 (VBlRProt p.162). The content of the Expropriation Act is considered to be in favour of the German Reich within the scope of the protection assumed for the Protectorate (§ 1 para.1); . as far as the provisions of the expropriation law cannot be applied directly, they must be applied mutatis mutandis (§ 1, para.2); 3. the protectorate bodies retain the rights, powers and duties conferred on them by the Enteiligungsgesetz, unless the Reichsprotektor entrusts other bodies. It is questionable whether and what modification of its contents § 6 of the Expropriation Act has been made by the above provisions. is provided that a department of the State Administration has a property which is owned by St. S. V3-13241