STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1545, sig. 109-4/1299

Page 5

English Translation

La in Iglau. He was also granted orally in this case that a sale of the house was not possible at the moment. The reason for the Antr was that P. wanted to set up a shipping bookshop in the house that had storage rooms in the basement for a forwarding company. According to a note dated 8 September 1994l, the trustee of the house verbally recalled the request on behalf of Politzer, but now justified it by the fact that P. had to give the premises rented by the municipality of Iglau to the city. On request, the government committee misrepresentedly informed me that Fr. with the municipality a 25 year old lease was concluded, which on the part of the municipality as landlord is indefensible. After Pollitzer first applied for a distinct single-family house, and then gave his application for the house Rahmhofgasse lo with incorrect information, I had to assume that he was less concerned with expanding his business than with a pronounced capital investment. In this situation, I could not grant the requested approval on the basis of the cited document of 3.l0.l940 and gave the applicant the decision included in the copy. In the entry now available, Father justified the need for the purchase of the house Rahmhofgasse lo by the fact that he wanted to build Tue a travel bookshop. It should be noted that the house does not have a shop, but only warehouses in the basement. A need for the construction of a travel book handling at this point exists in contrast to the information provided by the P.nieat since the travel traffic is mainly handled by the central station O. The train traffic via the city station has almost only local significance. The travel audience is therefore mainly made up of workers, rural population and pupils. iens In the situation described above, the present input of the P. in my assumption that it is primarily about a favorable capital investment, can only strengthen me. In my opinion, there is no economic need to dispose of the House of Rahmhofgasse 10 at this point in time. I note, in conclusion, that a dejudgment of this land would have to be carried out via the Emigration Fund for Bohemia and Moravia.