THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1023, sig. 109-4/776

Page 19

English Translation

2/ - lo - by no means used for a reduction, refuted by the particular testimony of Dr. Rudolf and Iang.- In the case of Winterhilfswerk, Krampf denies the appropriation of the money; he originally wants to have withheld the first 2oo RM for a later collection and then put all 3 amounts together in a envelope and provided them at home for relief, but did not come to the delivery before other work until the arrest. Apart from the fact that even after this admission the first 2oo RMs were deprived of their intended use, it may be that convulsions in all three cases do not have the intention from the outset to mislead the money. In fact, the German criminal police did not find the alleged envelope despite a three-fold search, and thus it has been proved that, contrary to its claim, Krampf is not prepared- C t c T Cee e That is quite certain to him in view of his other actions; despite the lack of proper receipts from the donors due to his official position against them, he did not have to fear. III. Schafranek and Brauner. 1.) In these defendants, cases of non-obligatory conduct of service transactions in connection with the reception of private donations are not established. However, Brauner at least once, Schafranek several times, after completion of the aryanization procedures with which Schafra- nek was employed as a clerk and Brauner as an office clerk, received money gifts from the company recruiters, whose connection with the arbitration procedure was obvious and also recognized by them. On 24th January 1994 Schafranek received from his office Viktor Baumann in Brno, whose acquisition of a Jewish house was approved five days before by the Oberlandrat, when "little Christmas present" handed over a leather letter with 5oo K contents. On the same day Professor Adolf Sochor, who had bought a Jewish house two days before, brought him an envelope with 5oo K