THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1023, sig. 109-4/776

Page 18

English Translation

75 - 6 - nichttat. On the day of the German police on 14 and 15 February 1942 Karl Hoznor from Brno brought him a donation of 5o RM to the office on the 14.2.l942; for that he only gave him a personal offer. On the same occasion he received a donation of RM 2oo in sealed envelope to his home on 13.2.42 from the Treu- händer Münster of the company Fischl in Brno-Königsfeld, where Krampf found the money no later than 17.2.1942; on the same day Kramp gelegt - as a preface to Münster's office on Kramppf said to him that he had no official receipt forms anymore, and asked him if he required a personal confirmation of what the Treühän - which the Arising Officer of the Oberlandrat naturally described as not necessary to him. All these amounts of RM 45o together did not deliver seizures until his arrest on 4.3.1942, but consumed the money for itself. This situation is determined on the basis of the admission to the convulsions, the partly sworn statements of the Zeu - to Dr. Rudolf, Winter, Machala, Pauser, Gulde, Zimmermann, Gritzbach, Apeltauer and Dr.Buchta and the witnesses and objects - Jäckel and Lang agree as well as on the records of the Gulde and Pauser of the Oberlandratsamt. In the case of Machala, convulsions do not want to have been aware of the incompatibility of his recommendations or instructions with his servifical position, which is completely implausible with him as a lawyer; moreover, he admits the matter to Maehala.- In the Gulde case, he denies the government councillor Dr. It is clear from the above that, in the absence of any evidence of the existence of a dominant position in the market, it is not possible to determine whether or not there is a market economy in the Community and whether there is any reason to believe that there is an advantage to the Community as a whole in this respect. Whether the proposal to refrain from the compensation levy was objectively acceptable for other reasons (maintenance of the company in German hands) is irrelevant; in any event, it was influenced by indisputable considerations (seeking personal assessment) - in the case of breakers, the admission of the seizure is suggested that he had proposed a compensation levy and that he was entitled to a compensation charge.