English Translation

on page 9, the turn-overs, the Slovaks in Hungary, and the Czechs in the 1 7th and 1 8th centuries as examples. At that time, the leaders in Central Europe were supranational. Nationalism was not yet fully awakened, so that the transition from one people to another was made easier. Since the awakening of modern nationalism, such events, as often took place in the 1 7th and 1 8th centuries, are not easily possible. A comparison with the events in North America (l9. It is not appropriate because it was not assimilation (repopulation) in North America, but amalgamation (merging different ethnic groups into a new people). The overseas foreigners left their old homeland full of disappointment and were generally quite inclined to let themselves be Americanized, especially since they had the feeling that they gave up their original folkdom in favour of a new folkdom, whose spiritual and ideological direction was only to decide the future. In a similar way as in the question of the counterforce of contemporary nationalism, M. errs somewhat in the racial question. He takes racial moments into account, but does not sufficiently consider their meaning. A correction is required here, perhaps in a more negative sense, that it should not at all be allowed to repopulate Czechs, in which certain racial components (especially non-European, but then Aach Eastern Baltic, Eastern and Western, as far as they are completely predominant) play a role. The idea of M., together with the repopulation of Chechens, to carry out a "depletion" of the German people's body by the fact that inferior elements of the national body are transferred to the remaining Czechism, is hardly feasible. As far as human material is concerned, which presents a danger in terms of genetic biology, the legal means available are: