STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2337, sig. 109-11/139 Page 40 · 40 of 96
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2337, sig. 109-11/139
English Translation
37 - 21 - cases in the former opinion had a sufficient reason to interrupt the pregnancy; the health of the pregnant women would probably have been significantly affected by the child's delivery and delivery. The defendant Dr. Kafka on a medical indication. Since it was not possible for the court to make clear findings on these points and the expert evaluation could not lead to a proper opinion, it was assumed in favour of the defendant Dr. Kafca that even in these cases a interruption of the pregnancy would have been justified. With regard to all other cases, it has been established, on the basis of the testimonies and the statements made by the experts, that the diseases listed in the so-called indication tests and the general physical condition should not have been carried out. From the current state of health and the fact that most of these women have now reborn and are healthy, the two experts conclude that the diseases cannot have reached a significant degree, except in the cases mentioned above. 3.) The defendant Dr. Karl Schöniger carried out surgery on the following women and interrupted the pregnancy: 1. to Charlotte Freudrich from Berlin, Halensee on 7.5. of 1937 in the sanatorium Fink, in the 5th month/pregnancy, without an indication certificate of another doctor, for a fee of 300.- RM. 2. to Therese Fischer from Graslitz on 24. January 1937 at the sanatoire Fink in the 4. Conate of pregnancy, against