STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2322, sig. 109-11-124

Page 20

English Translation

9/ - Anonymous detailed letter allegedly sent to a severely tested woman of a contemplation opponent of the former immoral international regime of revenge and perverse Masonic philosophy persecuted by the Jewish-Bolshevik Freemasonry Justice of the Former Czechoslovak State. Busa of the Slaatsiekretär JMUEU bon Feidisprovktor ES 1 Translation. EAGA 86 ia Buhminund märten. CER EE Eing. - 9. SEP 1942 Your Excellency. DEIY COmOn Mr. Secretary of State! A od We turn to you as educated people, almost completely ruined by the former regime, yet we dared hardly breathe out of fear var 2 Jewish-Marxist revenge, in order to prevent any attack 6/*.4; here we hated terribly all the lum-perei, which the old perverted philosopher had founded with completely wrong morals, the vain and vengeful Greis Masaryk, a world-renowned Jew friend, and his talented cowardly pupil and thief, an unsightly male, but very great intriguer and equally vain and revengeful criminal Beneš!!! In spite of all conceivable caution, it has also happened to people very keenly that some of Beneš's night rescuers and saliva hunters, in order to flatter themselves "up above", denounced something: a record of uncomfortable leuté existed and the main evangelists were Jews, Bolsheviks and "observers" assigned to each authority, who, of course, had to be well recommended by Masons before or at least recognized by them as reliable. This yQualification" fell completely away within the Czechoslovak judiciary, for it stood from the top to the sole completely under the influence and hands of the Jews and Freemasons, of ministers and their devoted presidents and highest councils of the Supreme Court in Brno, beginning with the last intern and secretary at any remote district court. It also looked out for it; it did not decide the right, but the political party legitimization, a wish "from above" in favour of one or the other party without regard to which side the truth was on and therefore also the right and justice should be! Had a witness according to his best knowledge and conscience the purest truth asserted,