English Translation

_P_174/4L_ Translation. 6 41 Order. The district court in Neuchâtel/Elbe/, Abbot I. decides in the matter of the education and nutrition of the underage Jaroslaus Sladkus, born on 25. Represented by Wenzel Kraus, general guardian of the district youth welfare department in Neuchâtel/Elbe/ as collusion curator tolZgender- massen: remains in education with his mother Anna Sbdkus The underage Jaroslaus SladusYin NeuchÃ1⁄4nenburg/Elba/ NC l665, the father of the child Rudolf Sladkus, official of the company Procházka and Comp. in Neuchâtel /Flbe/, resident in Kschinetz NC 42, is entitled to move with the child twice weekly during the various days according to the agreement with the mother of the K des. Rudolf Sladkus is obliged to pay the amount of 500.-K monthly from the .l4.t.194l starting up to the amounts due to the legal force within l4. Days, the amounts due in future always on the first day of the month at the hand of the mother of the child, to pay all this under execution. This decision is made until further injunctions have been issued. Reason. With the judgment of the district court in Jungbunzlau of 25 July 1940, G.Z. Ck I a 293/40-4 the marriage of Anna Sladkus and Rudolf Sladcus was divorced from the guilt of the defendant Rudolf Sladkus. The Fleteren agree on the education of the child that this remains with the mother. Dubch's investigation of the decisive circumstances, by the request to the district youth welfare and by the interrogation of the collusion curator, the court has found that this agreement is beneficial in the interest of the child and it has decided on this point as above. Also with regard to the alimentatin costs the approval of the agreement is obtained by the amount of 5oo,-K., because it considers this amount to be more than reasonable, because the child is only 3 years old today. It was therefore decided as above with the provision that the father in the sense of § l42 of the All..B.G.B . the right to return with the child and that the court reserves itself closer to the traffic regulations, if the Elders darøber do not agree. Against the order a recursion must be submitted to the protocol or in writing to the undersigned court. The decision is due to the district courts. The signature of the lawyer is not necessary. Neuenburg District Court, Abbot I, Stamp 3,-K. on 16 December 1941. Fridrich Seifert For the correctness of the copy, law firm manager: Franz Janda e.h.