GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 565, sig. 110-4/413

Page 63

English Translation

-- 17 -- who studied the sketched social contract more closely then it was immediately clear to me that I will again stab in second wasp nest and for that I truly had no desire after the experiences with BOsKO and the there "provisions" and embezzlements. The Boskowitz people were, without this, not good at talking to me and now there was open outrage about me to expect if I would not allow fat profit shares to an atteigessenen Boskoitzer and even transport fat trustee fees from Boskotz to Brno. So the next day I went to Prague to the wealth office, took even the stylish partner of the company Štelcl, the Vg. Otto Estelberger with to the property office ynd explained there klipp and clear that I did not run the slightest company R. Štelkl. The lords of the wealth department advised themselves and then they insisted that of all things I the Ing. E. Beck from Brno, the trusteeship of the company Štelcl in Bos-kowitz, and the Mr. Office Board itself and in one person, Dr. Rückert, head of government, explained to me in front of the speaker Tax Inspector Eckert that I am a trustee of the Fa. The Court of First Instance held that the Court of Justice had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 85(1) of the Treaty. On this condition, I agreed to lead the trusteeship of the company Štelcl and to manage this company in the interests of the Reich.For it is clear to me: Insolange_ich_somewhere trustee_bin,_so_wealth_of the Empire and_somit_ofthe_total_German_Volkes_verwaltungen,_should not be a penny, also not a crown_unauthorized_come to the site. I vouch for this with my head and hand and with my entire and full private = wealth to the rich and German people. I handed over my applications to the wealth office, documented them with all necessary documents and justified my applications legally in every respect perfectly. The wealth office let itself for a long time with its decision. Finally the decision came down to me. It read in the sense of my applications: The social contract concluded with R. Štelcl at that time by Otto Estelberger is declared to be void, Otto Estelsberger is not a partner of the company Štel štelcl and therefore does not charge him the profit shares provided for in the contract and the contribution of RM l.O00.- is returned to him