STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1672, sig. 109-4/1427 Page 11 · 11 of 78
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1672, sig. 109-4/1427
English Translation
0V Appendix II. The author does not take any position even on the more spattered Hussite storms, except for hints such as: victorious force of huasiti- scher besiegesheere (p.24; vol. 11. 17o). ...therefore, here (Burg Hus') was the spiritual birth place of husiti= scher movement in the soldatic sense ( p. 3o). A juxtaposition of rich = deutach and poorer = czech for Prachatitz ( 5.48/49; 188/89; 284). Judicial attempt by the Hussites to justify their behaviour in Prachatz ( see 5o); on the same sbene typical is the remark about the breaking of the prachatitzers (German) because of the advance against the only hoarse sides in the city ( B.5o). The builder of the imperial castle Karlstein was certainly not a czechim scher Keister, but Matthias von Arras/Peter Parler (p. 51/52). Original remains of former Celtic inhabitants entered the new Siede lern, the Slavs (see 59). Authors let the Slaves get to Bönmen before the beginning of the 3rd century! ( 9. 1o7; 1o8; Br. I1. 227). He emphasizes their "peasant nature", the pre-conceived "predominance of the Czes" over the other Slavic tribes, but forgets to necessarily emphasize their relations with the Avars. The Avars are not present until the 6th century Vitte dea and submit to the Slavs who become the "Sinvolk* under Czech leadership in Bohemia (3,115). Samo appears only as an "immigrant" abs to the Slavic Netherlands, without even mentioning his Frankish defamation ( see.116). The Pruzzos are not "Lituslavic" (p. 113, 126, vol. 11.194), they belong to the Baltic group of peoples, whose language distinguishes them from the Alawic. Also Miseko ( Dago ) appears only ala Polenhersog sus to the Piast family (!!), who becomes durck Cas Verdinst of his " glacet benastarken tachechian wife Ccatholic : (s.122) O0