STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1643, sig. 109-4/1398 Page 44 · 44 of 49
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1643, sig. 109-4/1398
English Translation
h2 31 - eye service to the superior authority for obtaining service benefits.Always it had to be assumed in his favour that comradely consideration had been the driving force for his act, from which ar himself did not derive any immediate advantage if one refrained from the low self-receipts of the accused Krejča and Exnar. Above all, it was not to be refuted to him that he had received assurances from Biskup about the ministerial back cover and therefore freed himself internally from the main responsibility. Under these circumstances, he could not be regarded as a typical people's pest, which is increasingly true of the defendants Vodiêka, Mêstecky and Dobfensky. the type of the submissive, involuntary official who, when he did so, only managed to be pleased with his high superiors.However, he went to work with an active force and as a great buyer of little choice in the choice of his persuasions. What distinguishes him from a typical slider personality is the unselfishness and selflessness when making the moves,He has always charged the purchase prices without any surcharge with Zavazal, for his corridors and troubles never demands compensation and only occasionally provides himself with meat within moderate limits.His own interest in the act Mêstecky and Dobfensky were practically only henchmen of the accused Jindra.Both are willing,subaltern natures, which are not responsible in their subordinate, completely and even dependent position in the executions carried out internally. They felt that their actions were illegal and could not be demanded by their superiors, even if they knew exactly how Vodiêka was supposed to do it.As far as they had achieved their own merits through their participation in the appeals, they had previously obtained the consent of their superior. All in all, both were acting only in the hands of the defendants Jindra and Macoun.