STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1643, sig. 109-4/1398

Page 40

English Translation

22 -. 27 - (§ 9 of the Rogation Ordinance of 10 May 1939 -No.12l Collection of laws and ordinances-, §9 of the Rogierung Ordinanz of 18 September 1939 -Nr.206 Collection of sentences and regulations-, SS 1,2,1o,1l and 14 of the post of the chairman of the Regierung of 29 September 1939-Nr.211 Collection of the laws and regulations.-) According to § 2 a AtGB, the criminality of its act according to the at present the completion of the act, i.e. according to the Kwvo, which entered into force in the Protectorate on 19.4.1941, the individual proceedings before that date can be safely included in the continuing relationship, as they were already punishable before the 19.4.l94l. To that extent, the Kivo did not procure a new criminal offence, much more the existing criminal offence In such a case, a continuation relationship is given to the legally amended criminal offence.(see,Kohlrausch,Erl.III to § 2 a StGB and RGSt 68 S. 338, 71 p.92).The individual acts committed by the defendants mentioned above have been effectively and legally equally committed and have consistently been directed against the same legal property, namely against the proper functioning of the war economy.Their intent at the beginning of the individual black remunerations, according to the temporal and actual circumstances of their act, comprised the overall success from the outset. The purchase of the six pig halves in November 1994o was so far short of the black cover of the 50 kg meat in June and July 1994l that in this respect, the continued action 77 could no longer be adopted.However, the two-time purchase of a total of 50 kg of meat in July and July 194l only fulfils the condition of § 1 para.l KWvo. The offenses of the accused Biskup and Vodiêka have been supported and substantially promoted by the defendant Zavazal in carrying out the distribution, assistance with the delivery of the meat and collection of the invoice amounts.He is therefore guilty of the continued aid to the crimes committed by Biskups and Vodioka within the meaning of § 49 StGB.