STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1643, sig. 109-4/1398 Page 35 · 35 of 49
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1643, sig. 109-4/1398
English Translation
19a - 22 - all the officials of the Landgendarmeriekommando, in strict order, without respect for the person and the batch,and the fact that Biskup danit, without favoring his person or his household, had nothing but trouble and inconvenience that the welfare and social motives he stressed might have been the determining factor in his deed. The defendant Jindra argues to his apology that although he knew the illegality of the meat procurement operation, he believed, in accordance with the assurances of the Biskup, that the black cover was covered by Minister Ježek.He also did not know the full extent of the black purchases and ordered the cessation of the action in April l94l. his knowledge of Mêstecky and Dobrensky in the summer of 194l was only obtained in two, at most in three individual cases smaller quantities of meat for the comrades in Prague, against these later deliveries he had done nothing, because he had not accepted a threat to the war economy because of the small amount of meat. The prisons would have to be overcrowded even more than at present if all black people from the year 1994l were held accountable for such, in relation to the total need for insignificant blacks. This admission is true inasmuch as, according to the account of the defendants Mêstecky and Dobfensky in the early year of 1994l, Jindra actually recommended that pigs be black-dressed.In legal terms, the defence of the accused Jindra is of any importance, as is explained in more detail in paragraph V of the judgment. The defendants Nêmejc and Koukal claim that they did not know the black person in the context of the self-help action organised by Biskup.Nênejc claims that he was on 86463