English Translation

5 - 4 - has been discussed with confidence and in accordance with the views of both parties, and the details of which are to be discussed here today. However, I would like to say that with this redesign, different things will disappear, which, like the Jewish "acting out=" of raw material contingents and the additional allocation of raw materials "from the realm", have contributed a great deal to the constant return of the aforementioned false question about the nature and content of the protectorate. If, in future, the present system replaces the establishment of production plans and the granting of production obligations to the farms, there can be no doubt that such production plans can only be drawn up uniformly for the whole Reich=area. But only one position in Prague can take care that the large and non-airborne generation capacities in the Protectorate are so intact in every respect that the Protectorates can really fulfill their share of the production= tasks of the whole empire. For example, I should like to point out that it is only possible to provide individual care for the protectorate enterprises, including the German enterprises with their special national tasks and their difficult position in the foreign people, only from Prague. The Prague of the supply of coal, electrical energy and fuels to the protectorate economy can also be treated and solved only in Prague. It is no different with the resolution of labour problems and the solution of wage policy problems. Last but not least, it is also necessary to decide on the conversion of the civilian to war production and on the war-related closure of enterprises with their political-psyhological effects in the Protectorate itself. Therefore, if the Reich Protector is compared to the instructions of the individual Reichsstellen, which are derived from the establishment of uniform production plans for the Gesante Reich - 5 -