THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, INV. 3, Sig. 109-1/4

Page 2

English Translation

form Alh ribongeler brew defeg nobroed setenbigdoan baan eib nisten ezaew al , etaala nedii örduanü vs aatb bou awfletazeta neeofeieddov Prague, 2 January 190. mued rodetongadole neb ret dededo olle Ase 1st note. reterleatanva rrrel.S dgelegzov denodeyre sañmezagauetow For the implementation of the regulation on the construction of the administration etc., in the Protectorate of 1.9.1939 (RGBl. I, p. 1689) : On 1 and 2 February 194o the Minister of Justice Dr. Gürtner will be present in Prague on the occasion of the introduction of the President of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General, and will probably also raise the question of the limitation of responsibilities between the Reich Protector and the Minister of Justice in the field of German justice in Protectorate, as well as the issue of reporting by the Presidents of the Higher Regional Court and Attorney General. Should they report exclusively to the Reichsproteke gate? Or to the Imperial Justice Minister, for example, with the simultaneous notification of a copy to the imperial protector? Or the Reich Justice Minister about the Reich Protector? After the Reichsprotektor has been subordinated to the Reich Protector in the Protectorate by the constitution decree, in all cases only to the Imperial Protector must be reported from them. The possible transmission of reports to the Berlin central offices etc. is its matter. A division of the reporting, for example, in the form that, depending on the lead, it is necessary to report to the Reichsprotector or the Reich Justice Minister, is not applicable, because then in all cases - and these are extremely frequent - the decision on the authority - 2 - I A/4054