STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2692, sig. 109-12/340 Page 178 · 178 of 99
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2692, sig. 109-12/340
English Translation
In the case of the Czechoslovak state, the principle of organisation is also shown on the same side, since it is necessary to be decisive in the meaningful construction of the Czechoslovakian state. The unity of a state is expressed in front of all : l/.In the common head of state, to which the same cachtfulle has to come in all parts of the state; 2/. In the uniform representation for the whole state vis-à-vis other states. (Ia two Reuten Reiche e.g., these aspects were not even taken into account because Bavaria had the right to envoy, and despite that nobody doubted the unity of the second German Reich.) 3/. In the common army (see section Oester- reich-Hungary, in which the army was undoubtedly the strongest guarantor of the unity of the state, in spite of the most extensive concessions in terms of regime language and so on). 4/. In the joint Velkr representation for the desant state; 5/. In the common constitution, which cannot be changed without impinging one of the sub-members of the state. 6/. In the unity of the courts of law.7/. In commonance of the highest administrative bodies (Ministries). 8/. Above all, however, in the common sense of the general government. Where all these demands have been met, there is no doubt that there is a single state. Anyone who denies this is opposed to any teaching of the Steats which has been held so far. On point II : let us just note that he re-emerges from the Old Austrian organisational aprincipia, which in the old Austrian Empire have not changed any ways in the vülkisch genishten. To deal with the individual sub-points, my manifestation will swell to such an extent that I am abstaining from any further execution. I can do so more than there is no doubt about the inadequateness of the proposals of point II. On Funkt III, it would be worth noting; the judicial guarantee of public rights undoubtedly has something extraordinary. However, it only has meaning if there are national disputes and there is no interruption on the agenda. If foreign national disputes are not other vilifications of the political battle, then courts are unsuitable to resolve such disputes.