STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2719, sig. 109-14/21 Page 4 · 4 of 4
A SOCIETY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2719, sig. 109-14/21
English Translation
-3-3 to conclude, it is simply necessary not to agree with everything, which I have explained, but that it does not matter, but rather that the final objective is right and that this objective is being worked towards. Then Köster spoke about trade union issues in a rather unsavory way and offered so many areas of attack for the party that it was precisely during this lecture that Eigruber's violent involvement in the position of the NSDAP in Bohemia and Moravia came about. Although at the end of the lecture Köster's work was quite correctly described, it must be noted that Köster was very much in doubt by this collision as to who was actually the determining factor in Bohemia and Moravia, the Reich Protector or the Party. In a few sentences, District Leader Knoop gave an account of the state of the work of the HJ and the Board of Trustees. Adolf factually reported on the war achievements of the economy in Bohemia and Moravia. Finally, Schulte-Schomburg was to report on events which were to testify to a lack of agreement between the NSDAP and the Reichsprotector. However, since the time had already progressed enormously, there was only one debate about the Landguard and the various police inspectors. In this debate, the Ordnungspolizei cut off extremely badly, and further discussions were not held. After discussing the primacy of the NSDAP on the issues of national policy during the official period, n essen asked to clarify, within the framework of the pa of the participating head of the gauamtsleit, how the par ticipation with Gauleiter Eigruber c er probably to the Tc I say