STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2562, sig. 109-12/209 Page 100 · 100 of 88
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2562, sig. 109-12/12209
English Translation
87/4 game was drawn. However, in a different way than the one hoped for. Thus, this now apparently jluge, in reality overlapping. genre diplomacy, has given the empire itself into the dispute over the tic justification, which it tried to bee# to argue with him. It was Prague's foreign policy, one in the hope of intimidating the empire, on the other hand, to bring the mathematics of the Bünsni obligations into the role which first threw the military means of power into the struggles. The Münhhner Conference was now nothing more than the execution of this unanimous European opinion on the untenability of Czech Slovakia and the complete sense of rationality to maintain it by force. This mature and in-depth knowledge of European public opinion was the current that gave strength to the formal French-Checho-Slovak covenant and made it morally and politically a dead letter. Thus the Müchner agreement was in a sense only the political and international seal of the assessment of the Czechoslovak state problem existing in the public opinion of Europe. Collapse of the politics from which he was born. He would never have survived a war and his demise without real war took place automatically. He was destined for submission when his largest minority found sufficient support from the outside."The "Times" then recalled that Czechoslovakia was always an active part of the anti-revision system, a constant hindrance to a scientific natural grouping of Central and Eastern Europe. And literally it was said: "Those who wander today by a betrayal of a small people are worse than false enemies. Between 1919 and 1935 there was no liberal or laboratory man with respect for himself, who, like most English, did not brand politics as useless, even immoral, on which the multi-ethnic state of Czechoslovakia was built. If we now in London forget these findings and insights at the time, and let the cheap propaganda theses of the emigrants' circles run full, it does not remove their correctness nor does it remove the argument that all this has no longer applied since the Rrwteta Protectorate was established. The establishment of the Protectorate, on the one hand, is based on the decision of the Slovaks,