English Translation

28-26 - In the case of Veger (No. l6), although she had requested a security deposit of 10,000 K, she had not accepted any money from the lawyer Veger. She had been used by Dr. Blaha, by the co-defendant Mimra, and - as she claimed for the first time in her closing statement - by her bride- gam Palda as a tool for her own enrichment. These three persons had been well aware of their fraudulent behaviour, Mimra had played the Seriös Amwalt outside, but in almost all cases participated in the distribution of donations and deposits. In total, he had received about half of the dizzy money contracts, and in part also collected "cautions" (e.g. in case of Chod) did not pass them on to her.She had also sent a part of the money to Mimra, a friend of the defendant living in bad conditions. In the case of Sambera, Dr. Blaha had received 20.O00 K for not having been arrested; with Samber and Count Koloredo-Mansfeld she had ever gone to the office of Dr. Blaha in the Kastan avenue and offered him money while the witnesses were waiting on the road. Blaha had only accepted the money in the Sambera case and immediately telephoned the Gestapo in Jungbunzlau that the planned arrest of the Samberta had been reversed. In the Koloredo-Mansfeld case, she had asked Dr. Blaha to direct the offered 10.000 K to Mimra, which she had also done in accepting the division between him and Mimrah. She had obtained her complete information from Blaha, who had shown her, for example, in the case of Kotrcova and in other cases, the death certificates already completed for persons who would soon be executed, for which she had kept him free in the sects in the Barba bina bar. Her fiancé Palda had been informed about the whole context. He was wealthy from home, but could not dispose of it because he was with his father