STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1964, sig. 109-6/56

Prev
Page 38

English Translation

3y Prag Nüenbergerstr. 27 Sernfpe.: 68863/64 Statement on the order of the Chief of the Main Office 1 Court to appoint the most senior judge of the Li-u Police Court Vii with the direction of the Abbot rfI of the Commander of the Wafienlt in the Protectorate. The taking over of Abbot III of the commander of the Arms I.P. by the most senior judge of the 4th and 4th Police Court VIIl is inappropriate for the following reasons : This results in a plentiful increase in work for the oldest judge who must lead to the assignment of another judge to the Court VIlt. (a) The entire correspondence in Dissiplinars before the subordinate units and departments with the command office and vice versa will run through the division III. b) It can be overlooked that within the staff of the Commander of Arms there is ongoing work for Abt.IIf, which is time-consuming according to its nature. e) The Section III will also have to answer all complaints against disciplinary criminal orders of commanders and service managers and propose to the Commander for decision. The work in Section III is of a subordinate nature, without independent, own responsibility of the employee. For them can be taken every average 4-leader. It is therefore unnecessary and inappropriate to burden the qualified and anyway heavily used labour force of an l judge on these things. (a) The Head of Division III of the Commander of Arms-4 shall, in all cases which come before the Tribunal, be appointed as a court officer. He shall be an auxiliary organ of the Tribunal and shall have recourse to his duties. the order of the courtlord to carry out investigative acts, to perform the presentation of witnesses, co-seaters, the presentation and procurement of personnel documents, etc. With all this small business, the most senior judge - and even at the instruction of the head of the prosecution of the Court - would have to deal with himself. b) As a result of its participation in the preliminary proceedings, the senior judge would be excluded from the main proceedings in all these cases by virtue of the law as chairman.