English Translation

1688 Jurisdiction [Deutsd durch Urt. v. 28. June 1939, the LG. has the further one. However, this does not exclude that action completely dismissed. Carriage of parcels delivered eber The Kl. has appealed against both judgments, as far as they are detrimental to its public service, i.e. in practice. In doing so, she has been promoted to 2488.76 RM by her former authority and authority, or yet to the extent that she has suffered damages, and to the care given to her. The claim for compensation for pain is criticised as too low, but, moreover, the question of official liability from the Z maintains her claims. On 1 March 1939, the Court of First Instance of the German Federal Republic of Germany dismissed the application for the annulment of the first action in its entirety. However, in 1938, the decision of the Federal Court of Justice of the Austrian Federal Republic was taken against the appeals. In March 1939, it was supported by the fact that the transport of letters amended the judgment of the LG. and that this action was entirely ab- exercise of official authority, including reference to the foreclosure, and that it also referred to the appeal of the Kl. against the judgment given on the right of post at the post office. 28. Funi 1939. However, it is not of decisive importance in the case of RG alone and referred to recklessly measured (cf. RG3, 158, 92/93). It is then (i.e. because the value of the subject-matter of the dispute for the RevJnst. (p.91) that there are no doubts as to the extent that the claim on § 7 of the German Stock Corporation is based on an undertaking which is also owned by a privileged entrepreneur. It is apparent from the case-law of the Court of First Instance that, in order to be entitled to compensation for pain and to be required to lie within the scope of statutory law, this company is required to be in the citizen's interest. 161, 347 = DR. Complaints only consider official liability. It asks 1940, 36 a1). Is this will now after the fundamental decision to do so whether the driver L. The first judge has only asked whether an obviating will concerning the P ak et Frane can be ascertained in the assumption that it is a matter of post-service transport. The argument itself rejects such a distinction, as has been said, on the basis of which it is based. Now the Be- Sen. v. 13 May 1938 (RG3. 158, 83 et seq.) the letter was, in some respects, different from that of the parcel mail, only on the basis of the difference between the nature of the mail (which, in the light of the fact that, although it was a fault, was a transport to the size of the consignments), and on the same result of the post and mail processing tasks to the recipient's knowledge that the carrier had been referred to the parcel. It is not clear, however, from an internal point of view, that the circumstances necessitated a different requirement that parcel mail services should not be regarded as falling within the scope of the official area of activity of the postal service. The point of view is that the transport of both postal goods from place to place, although both the post-compulsory and often indiscriminately, often at the same time in one and the vangs, is based on the same vehicle, the letters being collected in letter boxes but not as a public exercise, for example in NGZ. This is because only the Aus= 158, 83 ff. decided case, where the motor vehicle understood letters or means of power to transport parcels at the same time. In the case of postal goods, it has not been established in question, however, that the latter cannot be accepted. In the case of a postal service which comes before the Court of Justice, there is no letter note, any parcels which, as the exercise of public authority, carried out any official activity, i.e. carried out by the law of the Member State in question. The question of liability for damage caused by a mail vehicle in service to any official activity of an official of the Reich, one not dabon, whether with the country or any other public body entrusted with the performance of postal parcels, or whether at the same time sovereign rights are to be considered or otherwise compulsory postal end-of-line, which does not constitute the exercise of civil-law rights of the public servant (RG3. It is therefore irrelevant whether the tasks entrusted to the transport of mail are to be regarded as such under the provisions of Article 131 of the Code of Civil Liability (cf. Art. 2 of the Royal Decree of 15 June 1975). I, 844), whether the tasks to be performed by the applicant on the occurrence of the accident h in the public domain or whether they are in the private field of taking evidence shall be decided only. The term "official" is not to be understood in the legal sense of the state at a speed of about 8 km per hour, but falls under it any person entrusted with father at a distance of 4 to 5 m. civil service tasks (RG3, 155, 364 at the right edge of the road = JW. 1937, 2916 2; RG3, 158, 97/98 = FW.1938,2481 as the postal driver with the spiege is RG3. 159, 236/237 = JV. 1939, 6935). average speed of 25 hours In NG3, 158, 83 ff. now the erk. Sen. under load train came about 5.65 m in front of the rear right side of the road horse driving value into the high of the Kl.. Jn this eye bellic was the KL. Several meters to the right of the load train and had not yet begun to cross over to the left to overtake the vehicle which is in front of it. Therefore, the load truck driver, the BG. does not accept the Kl. in its considerations directed to the Schus of other road users. The Kl is then according to the further findings of the B.G. Into the space which endangers it between the horse-carriage and the load train and has been hit by the middle of the second trailer of the post-carrying train beside the front part of the carriage, i.e. at the height of the coach's bite, and thus fell. The BG. thinks that the Kl. would have taken Rütschicht at the given traffic position on the load train and at the right edge of the road descend from its wheel and