English Translation

252 10. Jahrgang 1940 Heft 40] Jurisprudence 1685 far he did not give it upon knowledge of the situation decision to exercise revocation. Because this would result. A folcher Jrtum was present with the deceased, if the challenge is correct because of the at the appeal itself under representation of his widow. After the running error not to be excluded. He has made such an insinuation of the eating with the reprimand of the tesamemate a declaration that he will recall it. However, it is too far from possible that the remedy in the many more numerous cases of the previous kind should be announced. By the way, the challenge would, if necessary, well and would not have given up on knowledge of the facts. Nevertheless, in the Nspr. and in the writings in the failure that the frrtum of a deceased, the little connection to the motives of the BGB, will fail. (V, 302) the opinion, at the very least, that the decision to revoke was still based on the fact that it had taken a decision not to be sufficient with the security to be required here, because the lack of resistance would have to be established. 1; Soer g el § 2256 BGB. Note, 1). The senate itself has pronounced in the same sense in KGF. 41, 97 below casually and has decided in a newer unexplained decision according to the decision. However, if the question is examined again, this cannot be recorded according to a change in the NG's nspr. on a very similar question. § 22 56 BGB Although the rebuke of the will can be regarded as a revocation, without the will of the deceased to revoke it. This does not necessarily follow, however, that the lack of this will should also be irrelevant from the point of view of the challenge. A completely same case of the contestability of a declaration of will assumed by the Geses is dealt with in § 1956 BGB. It follows that the failure to comply with the time limit and the acceptance of the inheritance may be challenged.