English Translation

1664 Writtenness [German law ver. mit JW den kann and the real legal custody to over- or if a sched threatens with the amount up to the day of the proliferation. The deadline expires at the court fund and soon is settled- All the cases where real negligence exists. may they now be committed by the parties or by the lawyer This borschlag was also especially justified for this reason, are in general so arranged that it is precisely when payment by cheque incredible that they were made by all the other failures, where only one misconduct had resulted. It is no doubt that such a regulation can be a far-reaching one. To make this difference is the demand, which means going simplification and court like lawyers one to the case law of § 233 ZPO. It is not easy to ask questions about the time-limits, and it is legitimate for those who are seeking to clarify the secret of the present regulation, and the current regulation has repeatedly given rise to questions of doubt.Dr.Friedrich Noisten, Berlin. and gives rise to differences of opinion. II. 2. In addition, however, it must be pointed out that the boroning up concerns itself at all with a regulation, the regulation, according to which the activity of the court and thus, which, like no other, has proved to be alien to life, can be considered to be unbearable the prosecution of the factual right of previous proceedings. The order that the court fund earns as a creditor. does not concern itself with the payment of a guilty amount within It cannot be pointed out enough that half a certain period is sufficient, but that it is sufficient to do so both with §74 GNG. and §8 519 Abs. 6 and the court itself of proof of the payment made 554 para. 7 ZZO. deals with provisions which must only be imposed in the case of the risk of intra-service irregularly worst inflation time, namely by measure v. 31 Dec. to the debtor and the grant of the 1922 (RGBl. 1923, I, 1) in our procedural law the legal guarantee is refused if the payment has not been proved or has not properly been received, before the courts were not at all entitled to claim that their activities are dependent on the payment of a fee as being the only thing in the world. With ease it would be possible to make Diefer more quantified as a result (Rittmann, "Komm.z. GKG.", 1909, Vorbem. III3 before § 8181). Regulation collects a plethora of decisions, which as an outborn of a non-life formalism be the fact that the earlier regulation must be drawn many years (e.g. RG.: JW.1931, 538; RGZ. It is clear from the foregoing that, in the absence of the Commission's proposal, it is necessary to take account of the fact that the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. the payment on the last day of the deadline with a German In the period of inflation, however, an advance post office was carried out (§ 35 ReichskassenO.) and the day was unreliable as compulsory, because otherwise the court costs before their day of payment, which came from the day stamp abdrud payment of the devaluation, applies. Even in the indirect post-inflation period this provision may still be found by the post office, so that the payer by the postal stamp at any time has had a certain entitlement to prove the timely payment. The draft of 1931 justifies the maintenance of the advance obligation by the fact that the Reich lives in difficult guarantee, that its payment is safely recognized as timely times, that one becomes in a state with a favorable one. For if he could also make the payment in good time with the and well-ordered financial situation from an advance obligation post office and remove the postal note by his trial, but in the present circumstances has not submitted to the court authorized, that is sufficient (p. 353 of the draft). still not to prove the payment, if the transfer by any chance a delay This proposal may have been justified 1931, the time of the most severe economic crisis and disintegration of finances as a result of which (RG.: FW.1932, 648). Weimar mismanagement. After the addition, however, the imputation that the postal note has been changed in the meantime should be the removal of the duty of borage, one of the most unpleasant because a conscientious party is rightly opposed to it, products of the Fnflationenzeit, and thus the abolition of the only evidence in its possession of its Zah- des §74 GKG. as in §8 519 para.6 and §554 para.6 3PO. as soon as possible. Even the draft of a ZP0 of the year 1931 had 3. If, finally, Verf. states that the interpretation therefore modifies §519 ZBÖ. to the point that the predecessor of §233 ZPO. It is not possible to determine the time limit within which the re-enactment must be granted to a further extent than previously in the case of a prosecutor, but only to agree to the procedural fee which he had requested. A large part of the lawyer's office is partly represented. But this proposal was also unsatisfactory. After convening colleagues, partly by transfer of war. he should no longer use the proof of payment he tasks to a large extent. One must be, but it was still the actual discharge by the addition of referenda and attorneys of the costs decisive for the maintenance of the deadline. However, since assessors is excluded. Due to the lack of the actual receipt of the amount indeed not in the administrative staff it is no longer possible for the lawyer to stand power of the parties, Reinberger is right to limit itself to the use to the former extent only as his counter-strikes to the draft of a Zpo. (JurRj. overlappingly proven employee. 1932, 103 suggested that § 485 of the draft be accompanied by the Zusas It would be impossible to add to this fact that the payment has to be regarded as a timely failure of time if the amount to be paid is to punish the Bolks co-operative and the lawyer by refusing to proceed to a post office of the German Reich for the re-enactment by the date of the deadline. The Court of Justice has been paid in and is about to enter it, RA.Herbert Schneider,Karlsruhe. Schrifttum Dipl.-Fng. Dr.jur. Heinrich Krieger, Mitarbeiter des Band 18.) Berlin 1940. Junker und Thinhaupt Verlag. Racial Political Office, RL.: Das Rassenrecht in 137 S. Preis brosch. 6,80 R.M. Südwestafrica. Comparative presentation of the German Krieger, "The Law of Racial Rights in the United Law and the Law of the Mandate, and States" (1936), will be grateful to the present further draft and application of a new system of work. Wins the new work Colonial Law. (Neue Deutsche Forschungen. Abt. State, on the law of the rasfen in South-West Africa in view of the new administrative, church, international law and state theory.