STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1943, sig. 109-6/35

Page 33

English Translation

25-8a 1662 Residency [German law with JW. fers, in particular the handing over of the goods (§ 433 BGB.), the price agreement must only be amended if it has also already taken place or not. Insofar as the pre-arranged price is higher than the future maximum transfer of ownership, the permissible price shall apply; in this case the agreed price shall be applied to the current contract, to be reduced to the maximum permissible price. If, however, the price agreed on by the seller is lower than the price already fully fulfilled in future obligations. In the case of prices, the formula price agreement is not required; in particular, ‘this provision shall apply to all deliveries which do not take place after the price agreed upon, for example, the maximum entry into force'. Also in this formula price comes to be upslow, because this price only after the clear wording for the question, which represents a ceiling, and every underlying contract is affected by the price quotation, price remains permissible and in the future everyone alone on the side of the seller remains. If the delay can still be re-arranged. The latter buyer has already fully complied with, the rule will apply above all if a maximum price already applied to the contract is not increased at all; the first case more; if the seller has already done part of it, it will become practical mainly if only the outstanding services are reduced with their existing maximum price. If, finally, consideration is taken by the price regulation; if a minimum price has not yet been prescribed by the seller, it shall apply, all that has been carried out above with regard to the provision for the contract in full fixing of the maximum price shall apply with inverse precaution. So the legal situation here is exactly the same as in the sign in the same way. The price agreement is therefore already mentioned in the above case, that the expression "to change this only if the agreed price under rule also applies to the minimum price in force at the time of entry into force; contracts" means "as far as the seller is concerned, it is in this case to be added to the minimal price. The price agreement, however, can remain completely unchanged All that remains there about the effects of the regulation, if the agreed price is even more detailed above the current contract, applies to the minimum price, since such a price also applies here in the same way. In the light of the above, it should be pointed out that, in the absence of a decision on the application of the principle of equal treatment for men and women, it is necessary to examine in detail the effect of a price regulation on current contracts in the event of entry into force of the agreement. "However, if the nature of the exemption is such that it allows the content of the contract to deviate from the terms of the agreement, the parties may, as sellers, withdraw from the contract." With this subject-matter a price different from that previously agreed will require the obligation of the parties to apply the permitted one, and at the same time also gives the right to the calculation of the price regulation on the current yields to pay this price. If the break-outs and a certain influence were granted to them, a statement was made that it did not contain a statement that the provision for current contracts does not actually apply to current contracts, that is to say, it should or does not apply. Regularly, this influence of the legal situation is, as in the same case, subject to a double restriction for a party. One-price rule, for the same reasons as once, the parties always have only the choice between which they are presented above for this case. The contract-saving application of the price regulation and the abolition of the distribution are thus entitled to be exempted from the exemption, and this omission of the contract comes to one also for the current contract to make use; definitive waiver of the intended business is equal, since however, there is no obligation for it to do so. However, the legal situation is not different even if, only under the conditions laid down in the new price specification, the exemption is determined that it could be concluded. In addition, this is usually to be applied in full or with restrictions — including the right of appeal — but only in the case of the current contracts. If the content of the contract is also different from the provisions of this case, it is deviating from the same price rule. If this is not the case, such a case in the case of a price regulation — any contract remains in full force. The parties are not obliged for the parties to grant the exemption on the basis of the right of withdrawal to apply the current contract on a regular basis. This is only to a small extent followed by the application of the price guarantee from the nature of the exemption permit, which excludes writing on an ongoing contract. The fact that this is already stated above, only allows to demand and pay a right of appeal for each of the two parties to the same price, but this is - always to be granted - is not mentioned here as a matter of course only the full right of objection to the price regulation - for the sake of competence; the right to the Community and to order. The legal significance of an exceptional cancellation of a contract by agreement of will for the current contracts is therefore not to be changed by agreement to the parties, as already mentioned above, which is not specifically granted. In the absence of the application of a price rule, the general nature of the contracts in force is no greater than that of the cases in which a price regulation is applied. This is also true in the case of contracts in progress, essentially in the field of civil law. The statement that the exemption is fully covered. Finally, it should be discussed how the application of the prescribed application of a price regulation must also be applied to the current contracts, never gives the seller the right to carry out a written contract and without regard to the civil law obligations. It must be distinguished whether the opponents of the contract are required to pay a price other than fixed prices, maximum prices or minimum prices. The exemption may be granted if a fixed price is required, each of the parties here is always exempt from the obligation under price law to deviating from - whether up or down - but not from civil law, for they are to change price agreement; in the future there will only always be a single permissible price based on a pre- price law, and this must also be written and can therefore only take the place of the agreed bidder for the price law in the current contract. If a maximum price is required, the parties will acquire the right to grant the exemption.