STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1696, sig. 109-4/1451

Page 33

English Translation

29 = 3 = Professor Dr. Klausingbeechrieb first in detail the unworthy teaching of the faculty and claimed that the students used time and money for journeys from and to the lectures and courses and did not attend part of it /cf. above remark p. 2/ He compared these conditions with the advantages of old-time-deutach universities and believed that he had reason to advocate that the German student would consider studying in Prague under solo conditions, some of the university teachers who had been assigned to Prague, despite the considerable financial advantages offered to them here, would leave immediately after they had given their place of work. Professor Dr. Wolff put the fabled justification in the foreground. The libraries could not develop, the seminars were dark, cold and useless, the universal education of the juries by listening to lectures of other faculties became impossible. The curator recognized the established reasons sn, grasped them and added that the impending closing of Czech Röherer's eyes would hope that the branch would find some riums in such a Selule. Since he is like a lawyer, he knows that the training of the lawyers differs from that of the philologists in that they have developed a unified field of knowledge and have needed institutions which are cen- tre- sed to this end, while these different subjects have studied and do not feel that spatial distance between their Semina pen is a deficiency, from his question whether Dr. Scholz etvas to bomerkbabe, he said: 1. The Prague branch of the Deutechen Zentrelinstitut for achievement and instruction does not have an authority, but the one of the Reichaninister