STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1436, sig. 109-4/1190

Page 24

English Translation

23 6.) Whether the purchase of a passenger car was necessary for the completion of the trust - derical administration for the "community - useful settlement cooperative in Prague". 7.) Why and why travel expenses and daily allowances for temporary employees employed in Prague of the "common - useful settlement cooperative in Prague" managed by the trustee are not related - the Viennese cooperative, arose. 8.) Whether the acceptance of the medium-term loan in the amount of K 500,000.- the R.P. was known and accepted by it. As to the individual questions, the trustee commented roughly as follows : to l.) Binding agreements on administrative costs with the cooperatives for the main administration, which I managed in addition to the "profit-making settlement - cooperative in Prague ", were not concluded. TO 2 ) The termination of the non-Aryan tenants was in agreement with Mr. Reg. Ass. Wesely with Mr Oberland - council in Prague, with Mr. RR. Kolitz with the secret state police and RR Lud - eternally from R.P. VII/3. Consider - ken have not been expressed by these three gentlemen. Zu_3) I believed myself to be a trustee for the planning of new buildings.