STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1566, sig. 109-4/1320 Page 260 · 260 of 212
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1566, sig. 109-4/1320
English Translation
217 R___g_i_o_n_{_l_e__G_r_u_p_{/__r/i_n. Except for the ongoing interventions, visits and other matters related to the social policy agenda, the speaker was mainly concerned with the interpretation of the newly issued government statements. In particular, circular letters were sent to the sawmills, crate factories and impregna- tions in connection with the announcement of the Minister for Social and Health Administration of Feber 194l, and to all Moravian chocolate and sugar confectionery factories in relation to the announcement by the Minister of Social and Public Health at Feber I94l. In connection with the newly prepared announcement for the stone industry, the speaker gave a precise interpretation of the prepared announcement at the meeting of the Steinidustrie's Evidence Agency in Briinn cine and received some further proposals and comments from the Fiimes involved, which were then passed on to the Stone Industry Group in Prague. At the meeting of the wage officers of the large metal plants in Lrünn, the question of uniform pay of employees was discussed after the announcements. Furthermore, the speaker gave a gencue interpretation of the prepared guidelines for § ll54 α abGB. In connection with the difficulties in the labour market in the political districts of Boskowitz and Tischnowitz, the speaker at the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Administration at Dr. Kotek took part in the extension of the report of the Reg. Vdg. 46/lg4l to the member companies of the economic group Ceramic Industry in the above-mentioned districts. All handshakes of Moravia were sued at the labour courts for payment of wages, whereby the workers represented by the Association of Construction Workers /Jednota dělnictva stavebnich odborü/ claimed additional payments from the title of Art. 7, para. A. In the lawsuits it is claimed that the workers did not earn the hourly wage + 15%. All dicsc lawsuits are based on an erroneous interpretation of the proclamation and it was forgotten that on the provisions of the