English Translation

+ 1V h386H K. J u lius Prag VII Winzerstr. l0. Prague, 24 April 1942 registered ! Mr. SS-Obersturmbannführer Oberreg.-Rat Dr. G i e s s 2 9. APR.'J42 at Mr. Reichsprotector in Bohemia and Moravia PragIV E 3 E E E = Czernin - Palais Eing 28. Apr.1942 Dear Mr.Oberreg.Rat! Following my previous submissions to you in my question concerning the company Brüder Veit, Prag Karolinental, I would like once again to ask you to do so. I use the written way to do this, since it was not possible for me to have a personal discussion with you. I had asked Mr. Onersturmbannführer Fuhrmann, as well as storm banner leader A. Naujocks, at the moment Berlin, to try to make contact with you because of my case, but I do not know if this has been possible in the short time of the comrades. I am from the Kreiswirtschaftsberatung in der Kampa, Pg. On this occasion Pg. Essler explained to me that two very serious applicants besides me were available for the company Veit. These two applicants are: 1. Mr B a r t a, who I have already told you in my previous submissions, of which I have also already explained that he already calls a larger company his own and that it would be fair for other applicants, such as I in this case, to do so. Mr. Sonnleitner. In this case, after the seriousness of the particular applicant from Mr. Kreiswirtschaftsberater, Pg. Essler, was particularly emphasized to me, I have now come to the Preuhän of the company Veit, Mr. Ing. Robert Reindl, resident of Prague XIX, Raabestr. l4 turned.- The explanations I received from Mr. Ing. Reindl which, above all, referred to Mr. Sonnleitner, have, however, taught me another. If the facts of the case are based on truth, which I must assume, since it would not have been clear to me if the trustee were to inform me of things which he cannot answer for, if only part of this is Tassaahe, then I do not think that Mr Sonnleitner should be admitted as an applicant at all. I therefore ask you in this case to have the trustee present to clarify the case in order to substantiate his information. I would point out that this information, for which Mr. Ing. Reindl claims to possess the necessary documents, is so disappointing that a transfer of the company Veit to Mr. Sonnzeitner TM-278a/41