English Translation

24 - 13 German officials, Hertel except as sovereign of the NsDAP and Wolfram as honorary bearer. In March 1942, the accused Hertel also expressed to the defendant Hacker that he denied him any preference.There had been a talk that had been delivered to the accused, Hertel Tongue.If, moreover, there had been an occasion to stop the unusual kind of delivery from the factory in order to avoid inconveniences, these events were not suitable to justify the annahne's being delivered too much. This was all the less accepted when the defendant Hertel once again urged his wife to be correct on the occasion of this incident. Moreover, the taking of evidence did not show that there have been untimely embezzlements to the defendant Wolfram, the Bokunding of the witness Rotberg does not allow such conclusions, to which the statements of the witnesses Pianka and Tür would also be released. On the basis of the testimony of the wife Wolfram, it can be assumed that the meat sent by the parents was also used in the hospitality of guests of the house. Nor does the testimony by the witness Prochazka give any significant evidence that in the household of the accused Wol- fram meat is spoiled. According to all this, both defendants cannot be proved to have been aware of the excess deliveries of meat from the Selchwarenfabrik to their householdations, since the defendants are therefore unable to prove the subjective facts, they were due to a lack of evidence for e z u s p r e c h e n. III. The decision on costs is based on §§ 465,467 StPO. Hallbauer Dannegger ez.: Dr. Bellmann lov /Accredited: Attorney General as head of the office. 60