English Translation

5a SS 196 ? Idolludac -2 has been taken. He has tried to place Mr. Oberlardesgericht President Bürkle as a witness in court before the 11th Penalties@ T@ chamber. However, the same was prevented from appearing. CB03 But also in the party court proceedings against the Reichs= Amtleiter Cnyrim and Reichshauptstellenleiter Dr. Wittig, who had to answer because of very different preliminary arguments, who did not have anything to do with the Coburg - Kohary 650E 0 0 Arbitration proceedings, Dr. Anders was not heard on the Prague proceedings against his activities. That same year, even in these two parties= court proceedings, no discussion was found. On the other hand, the Prosecutor General's Office of the Iand Court of Berlin did not listen to his submission of August 5, 1943, which was now one year old, that he should be heard in the Prague proceedings. This is no longer to be expected. In the actual non-examination, therefore, the=s Prague arbitration proceedings and the activities of Dr. In other words, in the context of any judicial authority, whether the Party Court or the ordinary court, the finding in the ruling of the Supreme Party Court on Dr. Arder's matters is surprising, "that in the course of another party court case he = had given himself that Dr. In other words, it has tried to use a political constellation: a dubious claim to its advantages, to bring in by comparison=. Therefore, it must be left unexplained which in=formations the Supreme Party Court owes this quite erroneous view. As a judicial clarification or determination after the referral of any judicial authority with this fermentation, this objectively incorrect = can by no means be considered, the Prague sighting procedure profoundly aspiring = the establishment of the Supreme Court of Tarteil. If this view: of the Minister of the Reich, as is apparent from my statement, is conditioned by a lack of clarity in my input, I would ask you to be able to correct this ambiguity. I 14844