Germany'S MINISTRY FOR CHEATURES AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 1136, sig. 110-11/74

Page 58

English Translation

32a 10 - 1939 ordered arbitrators to take a brief position on the same questions and to let me go. -adnollreaaebmklre 5.) Mr. Dr. In other words, to Mr. Keichs=T8SR8 140110 mihister about me, the great request that this claim = BE CSEP be made that only two persons can and will judge his struggle fairly in 1939, since in his 15 years of struggle against ONLY the Czechs were the only German places, B1 who did not tell the German struggle their work and Hilfé = OTOL, after the trial had revealed the justice of the demands. I need these positions O M9 of the Minister of the Reich and President Bürkgle .RISE to get a WOO rectification of an accusation by the authorities appointed by the leader. Mr Anders cannot be indifferent to what party and state think of his activity in the Protectorate l939. There is a gap too wide between the unanimous recognitions of his edictary work by the bodies appointed solely for this purpose, i.e. the Lord's Imperial Protector, the senior President of the Arbitration Commission and the Secret State Police Vienna - Prague, and the degrading assessment that a business of dubious nature has escaped when the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia was created. Ieh had the firm conviction that Professor Dr. Grimm, who was a precise connoisseur of the Coburg - Kahary case, was right to refer to the rectification of Dr. Anders as convincing to the Prague Arbitration Court, and to advise Dr. Buters, in a dignified and pleading form, to carry out this clarification on eEe VreHO Tlete. Mr Anders is basing his resolution; 0ES6 BObTean About me to turn to the high authority of the Reerrn Reichsminister ntNaRotenStel on two facts, one precisely this Be tesEorelTO sn's high authority dès Herrnsministers in this techechisch- SS7 ms German Vergevatigungsaffaire Coburg - Kohary, on the other hand on the fact that in the interests of neither D0 in word still in writing in the protector as reparation procedure even in a single punctuality the untruth TOvorOrrE said that up to now from no side even TAS a 14817