NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 1136, sig. 110-11/74 Page 21 · 21 of 162
Germany'S MINISTRY FOR CHEATURES AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 1136, sig. 110-11/74
English Translation
1Ba - 1 - 1939 ordered arbitrators to take a brief position on the same questions and to let me go to =.- 5.) Mr. Dr. Anders addresses to the Lord Reich= Minister about me the great request to forgive him this claim=. He has pointed out to me that only two persons can judge his struggle fairly in 1939, and that they are being promoted, because in his 15 years of struggle against the Czechs, the only German bodies that have not told the German struggle their work and help, after the primacy had surrendered the justice of the demands. I need this opinion of the Minister of the Reich and President Bürkglg in order to obtain a correction of an accusation by the authorities prescribed by the Führer. Mr Anders cannot be indifferent to what party and state think about his activity in the Protectorate in 1939. There is a gap too strong between the unanimous recognition of his work in this regard by the bodies appointed solely for this purpose, i.e. the Lord Reich Protector, the Lord President of the Arbitration Commission and the Gehine Staatspolizei Vienna - Prague, and the degrading assessment that a business of doubtful nature was to have escaped when the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia was created. I have the firm conviction that Professor Dr. Grimm, who, as an accurate expert in the Coburg - Kahary case, is effectively called to a judgment, is right when he called the rectification of Dr. Anders on the Prague Arbitration Procedure "convincing" and advised Herin Dr. Others to make this clarification in a dignified and pleading form. Mr Anders based his resolution on me on the high authority of the Minister of the Reich, on two facts, one on the very high authority, of the minister of the Empire, in this techechisch- deutsche Verwaltungsaffaire Coburg - Kohary, and the other on the fact that, in the perception of interests neither in word nor in writing in the protector as reparation, even on a single point, the untruth was said to him that to this day, from no side, even in 1483c, he had a