THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1262, sig. 109-4/1016

Page 17

English Translation

A b s c h r i f t. Ouerkom lo der Wehrncht Bln.-Schöneberg, d.29.1.43 A3. 2_f 24.74-_AWA/Krie S_e1.All-(Ia) Badenschestr. 51 1 1 3858/42 g Gehe mi registered letter Betr.: Totwehrrecht gegenuber Krietsfangen. Referral: Without. Inmer again the question of the treatment of the Kr.Gef. The Court of Justice of the European Communities held that, in the absence of a decision by the Court of First Instance on the application of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security and social security, it was not possible for the Court to rule on the interpretation of that provision to be interpreted as meaning that the provisions of Article 85 of the Treaty were to be applied in the same way as those laid down in Article 85(1) of the EEC Treaty. In this regard it should be noted in principle: 1.) H.Dv. 38/2 (Abbreviation:1929:) Art. 46 requires that Kr.def. cannot be charged with penalties other than the German soldiers. This applies to all Ar.Gef. except the Soviet Kr.Gefe. Pur sowj.Kr.Geff. gi)t the decree of OKw 2 f 24.73 AwA/Kriegsf. Allg. (Ia) No. 389/42 g ver. 24.3.42, Abscn. A, fourth paragraph. 2.) Indiscriminate and challenging behaviour of the Kr.Gef. against German guard teams and auxiliary guards as well as German entrepreneurs and workers forces and entitles them to intervene in the maintenance of their own would and national self-respect. German law also gives a handle for this: