STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 955, sig. 109-4/708 Page 25 · 25 of 23
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 955, sig. 109-4/708
English Translation
18 Regh. Arndts (Reichsprot,Gruppe Haushalt) suggests that the invoice co d d d cr d d o nisatorial changes be made. Whether such changes are possible may not be bourteilen, but perhaps, on the basis of the new Führer's Decree of 7 July 1942 (RgBl. I p. 329), there is such a delicacy. He pointed out that in the Goneralgouvernent there were also no differences made according to the nature of the activity of the Eiseln and that the same orders had to be possible for the proteltorate. MinRat Rheins (Reichsf,-ll, Orpo) agreed to consider appropriate organizational changes and to consider how the circle of Kinisterkd benefactors at the Bao in Prague could be grinned, the necessary investigations and firmings should be carried out by the Bdo in Prague, which was confirmed by the representatives of Bao present. Changes of decrees or decrees should be sent to the RdF before publication. Some vicars still made the question of budget estimates of the ministerial allowance, RegR. Arndts (Reichaprot.,Group Budget) represented don Standpunlt, that the linisterial allowance in the laushalt of the polizei, where the posssibilities of the benefactors of the It is estimated that peants and antelets will have to be brought forward, otherwise they would have to receive exact documents for each individual case, except if this would result in acknowledging at the cash registers. kmchamsnsmkmchrioamxhoxlomxhntnknmkkk mmimimimhmmm. RegR. On the other hand, Evers (Reichof.-%,Orpo) considered that the Rinisterial allowance should be applied in the budget of the Reichsprotektor. KinRat Kallenbach (RFll) initially had concerns about the estimation of the linisterial sulage in the budget of the Polisei and noigto about a regulation as it was taken by the Reichslomissar for the occupied Norwegian Çebiete, i.e. remuneration in the household of the police and ministorial allowance in the laushalt of the Reich Protector. Peuker (Rll.d.D.R.) was not found to be alert because it called into question the su Pulet a) gofundene Löeung, which was properly and appropriately regarded. The concerns raised by RegR. Arndts were acknowledged. Taking into account all the irregularities, it was envisaged that the ministerial allowance in the budget of the police would be included in Section V boim, Chapter 1a. In summary, the discussion would be as follows: On Punit a) and B): pp. On Punlit e):