English Translation

69 German cechisch The Executive Board of the V.Department Ricker On 16 April 1940, in the matter of sickness allowance for Martinek Julie from Blanz, the directorate informs you: The Kartinek had been appointed to the insurance company of the company Nejezchlep for the period from 1 May 1939 to 20 October 1939 in class 4/B, and for the time from 28 January 1939 to 12 December 1939 in Class 5 B. She fell ill on 13.12.1939.Since it was a repeated entry into employment with the same employer, her registration in pay class 5/B according to §.99 para.l would only have a linflux on the benefits, as soon as the change in pay occurred 4 weeks before her illness. It is therefore correct that she should have received the sickness benefit after the 4th and not after the 5th grade. As regards her application for the annulment of the directorate's circular dated 24.6.1931,the directorate informs you that they have not fully covered the circular. The law does not impose any time limit on the same employer for the determination of §.99, paragraph 1. According to the precise wording of the law, the determinationof benefits in a case of insurance which occurs within 4 weeks of the duration of the new employment with the same employers would be determined by the wage which is stated at the time of the earlier registration, even if this application was already due for a few years. For this reason,the Directorate has decided that this provision is only valid if there is no longer a longer period than 3 months between the first and second applications for registration by the same employer.With this decision, the Directorate has filled a gap in law which fully corresponds to the meaning of the law. Brinn, 19 April 1940 The decision of the Director Schuster e.h. Ditection of 24.6.193l will therefore continue